Duncan v. Rzonca

478 N.E.2d 603 (1985)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Duncan v. Rzonca

Illinois Appellate Court
478 N.E.2d 603 (1985)

Facts

Police officer Alan Duncan (plaintiff) was injured in an automobile accident caused by Raymond Rzonca (defendant) while responding to a false robbery alarm from Hinsdale Federal Savings and Loan Association (the bank) (defendant). The alarm was activated by Charles Doerr, the three-year-old son of Patricia Doerr (defendant). Duncan sued the bank, Doerr, and Rzonca for negligence. Charles also had activated the false alarm six days earlier, and Carol Crowell, a bank employee, told Doerr that Charles triggered the silent alarm the last time they visited the bank, causing police to respond. Crowell requested that Doerr keep Charles away from the back of her desk where the alarm button was located. Crowell stepped away from her desk, and another bank employee saw Charles behind Crowell’s desk near the alarm button and directed him to come out from the behind the desk. Duncan’s complaint alleged the bank failed to prevent the activation of the false alarm and failed to notify him that the alarm was false. The bank argued only hindsight could have allowed it to foresee that the silent alarm’s location or that failure to keep Charles under control would result in injury. The bank asserted that it had no duty to Duncan because Duncan failed to establish the foreseeability of the harm. The court granted the bank’s motion to dismiss. Duncan appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Unverzagt, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership