Dunes South Homeowners Association Inc. v. First Flight Builders, Inc.
North Carolina Supreme Court
459 S.E.2d 477 (1995)
- Written by Mary Phelan D'Isa, JD
Facts
First Flight Builders, Inc. (the developer) (defendant), the original developer of the Dunes South condominium, owned several units in the development, some of which the developer previously conveyed and later reacquired. The original declaration provided that the developer and the other unit owners would pay an annual per-unit maintenance assessment to the Dunes South Homeowners Association (the association) (plaintiff). Pursuant to additional terms in the declaration, the developer filed an amended declaration exempting it from its obligation for the annual maintenance assessment on remaining unsold units but requiring the developer to pay any operating expenses that exceeded the per-unit assessments collected from other unit owners. The association sued the developer for unpaid maintenance assessments levied on the developer’s units. The trial court granted summary judgment for the association. The court of appeals reversed after finding that the term remaining unsold in the amended declaration was ambiguous and presented a jury question, rendering the matter inappropriate for summary judgment. The association appealed, arguing that under the state condominium act, the developer, as a unit owner, was obliged to pay its pro rata share of the common-area maintenance expenses and that because the amended declaration violated the act, it was ineffective.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Frye, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 807,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.