From our private database of 22,300+ case briefs...
Dunlap v. Wayne
Washington Supreme Court
716 P.2d 842 (1986)
Marlin Dunlap (plaintiff), a bank branch manager, provided information to Robert Koivisto concerning a property-development opportunity. Koivisto formed a partnership with Marvin Wayne (defendant) and two others to develop the property. Dunlap continued to provide consulting services to the partnership, for which the partnership agreed to pay Dunlap $10,000. The partnership was dissolved prior to the project’s completion. Dunlap’s attorney then attempted to collect the unpaid $10,000 from Wayne’s attorney. By letter, Wayne’s attorney threatened to inform Dunlap’s employer that Dunlap was seeking kickbacks for attempting to arrange financing for the partnership. Dunlap’s requests for payment continued. Wayne called the president of the bank where Dunlap worked and told the bank president of Dunlap’s collection attempts. The bank president requested documentation pertaining to Dunlap and the partnership. Wayne and his attorney met with another official of the bank and provided the documentation. Dunlap was fired from the bank and brought an action for defamation against Wayne. Dunlap alleged that the bank president told him that Wayne had accused Dunlap of trying to collect kickbacks and engage in shakedowns, but both the bank president and Wayne denied using the terms “kickbacks” or “shakedowns.” The trial court dismissed Dunlap’s action on summary judgment. Dunlap appealed. The appellate court affirmed. Dunlap again appealed. The Washington Supreme Court granted certiorari.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Utter, J.)
Dissent (Dore, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 518,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee
Here's why 518,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 22,300 briefs, keyed to 984 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.