Dunlop v. Bachowski
United States Supreme Court
421 U.S. 560 (1975)
- Written by Rose VanHofwegen, JD
Facts
After losing a union-officer election, Bachowski (plaintiff) petitioned the secretary of the Department of Labor (defendant) to sue to set the election results aside for alleged violations of the Labor-Management Reporting and Disclosure Act (LMRDA). The secretary responded that his investigation did not warrant a lawsuit invalidating the election. Bachowski petitioned the federal district court to declare the secretary’s actions arbitrary and capricious and to order the secretary to file suit. The court found it lacked authority to review the secretary’s decision, but the Third Circuit reversed, finding that the secretary’s decision constituted judicially reviewable final agency action under the Administrative Procedure Act (APA). Because the APA’s scope of review is that needed to ensure that the refusal was not arbitrary, capricious, or an abuse of discretion, it entitled Bachowski to a detailed statement of the factors on which the secretary’s decision relied. The Third Circuit also construed the APA to authorize a trial-type inquiry into the supporting facts and whether election violations changed the outcome. The United States Supreme Court granted review.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Brennan, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 806,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.