Dunne v. Shenandoah Homeowners Association
Colorado Court of Appeals
12 P.3d 340 (2000)

- Written by Rich Walter, JD
Facts
The Shenandoah subdivision’s developer recorded the subdivision’s original restrictive covenants in 1984. The covenants provided no mechanism for their amendment or revocation. Of the subdivision’s four original owners, Adalouise Dunne (plaintiff) and one of her neighbors bought their subdivision lots in reliance on the 1984 covenants’ prohibition against sheep keeping within the subdivision. In 1989, without obtaining the original owners’ consent, the developer purportedly revoked the 1984 covenants and adopted new covenants, which omitted any ban on sheep keeping. The Shenandoah Homeowners Association, Inc. (association) (defendant) amended its by-laws accordingly. Soon thereafter, Paul and Terrianne Warner (defendants) bought a subdivision lot and began pasturing sheep on their property. Because this activity interfered with the original owners’ enjoyment of their properties, Dunne sued the association and the Warners to reinstate the 1984 covenants. When the trial court ruled against Dunne, she appealed to the Colorado Court of Appeals.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Ruland, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.