Dunne v. Shenandoah Homeowners Association

12 P.3d 340 (2000)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Dunne v. Shenandoah Homeowners Association

Colorado Court of Appeals
12 P.3d 340 (2000)

RW

Facts

The Shenandoah subdivision’s developer recorded the subdivision’s original restrictive covenants in 1984. The covenants provided no mechanism for their amendment or revocation. Of the subdivision’s four original owners, Adalouise Dunne (plaintiff) and one of her neighbors bought their subdivision lots in reliance on the 1984 covenants’ prohibition against sheep keeping within the subdivision. In 1989, without obtaining the original owners’ consent, the developer purportedly revoked the 1984 covenants and adopted new covenants, which omitted any ban on sheep keeping. The Shenandoah Homeowners Association, Inc. (association) (defendant) amended its by-laws accordingly. Soon thereafter, Paul and Terrianne Warner (defendants) bought a subdivision lot and began pasturing sheep on their property. Because this activity interfered with the original owners’ enjoyment of their properties, Dunne sued the association and the Warners to reinstate the 1984 covenants. When the trial court ruled against Dunne, she appealed to the Colorado Court of Appeals.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Ruland, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership