Logourl black
From our private database of 14,000+ case briefs...

Duplantis v. Shell Offshore, Inc.

United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
948 F.2d 187 (5th Cir. 1991)


Facts

Stanley Duplantis (plaintiff) worked for Grace Offshore Company (Grace) (defendant), previously Booker Drilling Company, as a roustabout on an oil platform. Shell Offshore, Inc. (Shell) (defendant) owned, but did not operate, the platform. While working, Duplantis slipped on a greasy board, fell onto the cover of one of Shell’s cranes, and was injured. Duplantis and his wife (plaintiff) sued Grace and Shell in federal court on June 21, 1990 for negligence. Shell denied any negligence and moved the court for summary judgment in its favor, on the ground that Duplantis had not shown that Shell owned the board Duplantis slipped on or was responsible for keeping the rig safe. Shell offered affidavits from Grace employees stating that the board belonged to Grace and that Grace was responsible for rig housekeeping. Shell’s witnesses alleged that the crane cover was kept below the crane’s pedestal, but Duplantis claimed that a portion of the cover went beyond the edge of the crane. All agreed, however, that the cover had not been moved since Duplantis started work. Duplantis opposed Shell’s motion, arguing that “Shell ha[d] failed to produce any competent evidence by which the ownership and placement of the board by it could be negated.” Duplantis submitted an unsworn, preliminary letter from an expert witness indicating that the housekeeping on the rig was inadequate and the cover was stored improperly. The court granted Shell’s motion, and the plaintiffs appealed to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Issue

The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Holding and Reasoning (Garza, J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A "yes" or "no" answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 199,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,000 briefs, keyed to 188 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.