DuPont Testamentary Trust v. Commissioner
United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
514 F.2d 917 (1975)

- Written by Joe Cox, JD
Facts
Alfred duPont built a mansion called Nemours, where he and his wife, Jessie duPont, lived. He subsequently organized Nemours, Inc., and transferred all stock in that organization to himself in exchange for the title to the house and grounds. The duPonts rented the mansion for $1 per year, and still paid taxes and upkeep expenses. In 1929, Alfred transferred $2 million worth of stock to Nemours, Inc., in exchange for which the corporation then assumed payment of taxes and upkeep fees. Alfred died in 1935. His will passed Nemours, Inc., to his executors, who were directed to establish DuPont Testamentary Trust (the trust) (plaintiff) to maintain the property. The stock of the corporation and other securities formed the corpus of the trust, and Jessie was both a trustee and the principal income beneficiary for life. After her death, the trust assets would pass to a charitable foundation. During 1966 and 1967, the trust’s gross income was $13 million. Jessie was paid $11 million. The sums of $255,753 in 1966 and $274,451 in 1967 were paid for general maintenance, with an additional $114,284 paid in 1967 for paving and rehabilitating decaying structures on the property. The trustees for the trust claimed all the expenses as deductions for expenses paid for the production of income or as administrative expenses. The Commissioner of Internal Revenue (the commissioner) (defendant) disallowed all of the deductions, arguing that the property was not held for production of income and that the expenses were not administrative. The trust appealed, and the United States Tax Court upheld the commissioner. The trust again appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Clark, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,400 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.