Durham v. State
Indiana Supreme Court
159 N.E. 145 (1927)
Durham (defendant), a deputy game warden, arrested Long for illegal fishing. During his attempt to escape custody, Long beat Durham about the head with an oar from his boat. Durham then shot Long in the arm. During Durham’s trial for assault and battery, the trial judge instructed the jury that Durham was not authorized to use lethal force in order to overcome Long’s resistance, that Long’s life could not be put in jeopardy for Long’s misdemeanor charge of illegal fishing, and that if Durham used a dangerous weapon to overcome Long’s resistance, and used it to endanger Long’s life and inflict serious wounds, then Durham was guilty of assault and battery. Durham was convicted and he filed a motion for a new trial which was denied. Durham appealed the conviction.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Martin, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 710,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee
Here's why 710,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 44,600 briefs, keyed to 983 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.