Quimbee logo
DMCA.com Protection Status

Dutt v. Kremp

894 P.2d 354 (1995)

Case BriefRelatedOptions
From our private database of 26,900+ case briefs...

Dutt v. Kremp

Nevada Supreme Court

894 P.2d 354 (1995)

Facts

Jack Rentnelli (defendant) was treated at a hospital in Reno, Nevada, for meningitis and hydrocephalus. After his discharge, Rentnelli’s health deteriorated. Rentnelli flew to Santa Barbara, California, where doctors inserted a shunt to relieve pressure in his brain. Rentnelli’s health improved significantly. Rentnelli’s family believed that he had received subpar care in Reno, and consulted Rentnelli’s attorney, Virgil Dutt (defendant), about whether to file a medical malpractice suit against the Reno doctors. Dutt had never before brought a medical malpractice suit. He reviewed Rentnelli’s medical records, reviewed medical literature about meningitis and hydrocephalus, and filed a malpractice action against the physicians who treated Rentnelli in Reno (plaintiffs). Dutt did not obtain the opinion of any medical experts prior to filing suit. One of the attorneys representing the physicians suggested that Dutt submit Rentnelli’s medical records to the Medical Quality Foundation for its opinion. If the foundation’s review of the records did not support Dutt’s claims, Dutt would dismiss the suit. The foundation did not observe any apparent negligence. One day after learning the foundation’s findings, Dutt dismissed the malpractice suit. Several months later, the Reno physicians filed a suit against Rentnelli and Dutt, alleging malicious prosecution and abuse of process. The court issued a directed verdict in Rentnelli’s favor, but the case against Dutt went to a jury. The jury found in favor of the physicians, awarding them $40,000 in damages. Dutt moved for judgment notwithstanding the verdict or for a new trial. The trial court denied his motions. Dutt appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Shearing, J.)

Dissent (Steffen, C.J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 541,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 541,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 26,900 briefs, keyed to 983 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 541,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 26,900 briefs - keyed to 983 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership