From our private database of 37,500+ case briefs...
Dwight and Lloyd Sintering Co., Inc. v. American Ore Reclamation Co.
United States District Court for the Southern District of New York
44 F. Supp. 391 (1937)
Facts
A licensing agreement gave American Ore Reclamation Company (American Ore) (defendant) the right to work (i.e., exploit) various patents held by Dwight and Lloyd Sintering Company, Inc. (Dwight Lloyd) (plaintiff) in exchange for royalties. The patents involved the sintering of ore. American Ore also held patents of its own pertaining to the same industry. These American Ore patents were the subject of a separate license granted by American Ore to United States Steel Corporation. Dwight Lloyd brought suit to cancel and rescind its licensing agreement with American Ore, arguing that American Ore’s licensing agreement with the United States Steel Corporation interfered with American Ore’s obligation to work Dwight Lloyd’s leases. American Ore counterclaimed for an injunction against termination. A special master was authorized to hear the issues and report to the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York. The special master determined that American Ore was not bound by any provision to work exclusively with Dwight Lloyd’s patents.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Bondy, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 631,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 37,500 briefs, keyed to 984 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.