E. I. du Pont de Nemours & Co. v. Berkley & Co. Inc.
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
620 F.2d 1247, 205 U.S.P.Q. 1 (1980)
- Written by Eric Miller, JD
Facts
E. I. du Pont de Nemours & Company (DuPont) (plaintiff) held a patent on a fluorescent-dyed fishing line. Berkley & Company, Inc. (Berkley) (defendant) sold a product that copied the patented invention and, in the process, made more than $7.5 million. DuPont sued Berkley for infringement in federal district court. Berkley admitted to copying elements of the invention but alleged that the patent was invalid for lack of utility. This argument was based on tests showing that the dyed fishing line did not glow under certain conditions. The issue of invalidity due to lack of utility was among the issues presented to the jury. The jury returned a verdict for Berkley, which was entered by the court. DuPont appealed to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Markey, C.J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 815,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.