Easley v. Reuss

532 F.3d 592 (2008)

Study Aids
Case Briefs Overview
Casebooks
Case Briefs
E
From our private database of 46,200+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Easley v. Reuss

United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
532 F.3d 592 (2008)

  • Written by Heather Whittemore, JD

Facts

Cynthia Easley (plaintiff) filed a lawsuit in federal district court against Sergeant Michael Reuss (defendant) under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 after Easley’s son, Christopher, was shot and killed during an altercation with a group of police officers. Reuss was the highest-ranking officer at the scene when Christopher was killed. The district court granted summary judgment for Reuss, finding that he was entitled to qualified immunity. The United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit affirmed the district court. Easley petitioned the court of appeals, requesting a rehearing and suggesting a rehearing en banc. In her petition, Easley argued that the court of appeals had failed to consider the state-created danger exception to qualified immunity when it initially decided her case. However, Easley never mentioned the state-created danger exception in any of her previous court filings.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Per curiam)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 791,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 791,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,200 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 791,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,200 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership

Casebooks

Legislation and Regulation

Key Terms