East Bibb Twiggs Neighborhood Association v. Macon-Bibb County Planning and Zoning Commission

706 F. Supp. 880 (1989)

From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

East Bibb Twiggs Neighborhood Association v. Macon-Bibb County Planning and Zoning Commission

United States District Court for the Middle District of Georgia
706 F. Supp. 880 (1989)

  • Written by Tanya Munson, JD

Facts

In 1986, Mullis Tree Service, Inc. and Robert Mullis applied to the Macon-Bibb County Planning & Zoning Commission (the commission) (defendant) for a conditional use to operate a non-putrescible waste landfill. The commission approved the application. The commission considered land-use requests from private landowners and did not solicit any landfill applications. The proposed site was located in census tract No. 133.02. Census tract 133.02’s population consisted of roughly 60 percent Black residents. There was one other private landfill approved by the commission, located in the adjacent census tract No. 133.01, that contained a smaller, majority-white population. Both census tracts were located within County Commission District No. 1, where the population was comprised of 70 percent Black residents. Residents of tract 133.02 (the residents) (plaintiffs) alleged that the commission’s decision to allow the creation of a private landfill in tract 133.02 deprived the residents of equal protection of the law because the decision was motivated at least in part by considerations of race. The residents argued that the decision to locate the landfill in the tract had to be viewed against the historical background of locating undesirable land uses in Black neighborhoods. The commission opposed the claim, arguing that a lack of discriminatory motive was evidenced by the fact that the commission had acknowledged racial and low-income discrimination, it expressed concern over community needs, and it regularly refused to issue permits that were vocally opposed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Owens, C.J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 812,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 812,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 812,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership