Quimbee logo
DMCA.com Protection Status

Eastern Associated Coal Corp. v. United Mine Workers, District 17

531 U.S. 57 (2000)

Case BriefRelatedOptions
From our private database of 28,500+ case briefs...

Eastern Associated Coal Corp. v. United Mine Workers, District 17

United States Supreme Court

531 U.S. 57 (2000)

Facts

The United Mine Workers of America, District 17 (defendant), represented employees of Eastern Associated Coal Corporation (plaintiff). The parties’ collective-bargaining agreement (CBA) required Eastern to prove just cause to discharge an employee in arbitration. Otherwise, the arbitrator would order reinstatement. James Smith worked on Eastern’s road crew, a job that required driving heavy equipment and subjected him to Department of Transportation (DOT) regulations and random drug testing. When Smith tested positive for marijuana, Eastern tried to discharge him. The arbitrator found no just cause for discharge and ordered Smith reinstated conditioned on a 30-day suspension, substance-abuse treatment, and further drug testing. When Smith again tested positive for marijuana, Eastern again tried to discharge him. But the arbitrator found mitigating circumstances warranted reinstatement, including Smith’s 17-year history as a good employee and his credibly testifying that personal family problems caused a one-time relapse. The arbitrator ordered Smith reinstated conditioned on a three-month suspension, paying arbitration costs, continued substance-abuse treatment, and random drug testing. The arbitrator also required Smith to give Eastern a signed, undated resignation letter effective immediately if he failed another drug test within five years. Eastern sued in federal court, claiming the award contravened public policy. The court concluded Smith’s reinstatement did not violate public policy, and the appellate court affirmed. The Supreme Court granted review.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Breyer, J.)

Concurrence (Scalia, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 545,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 545,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 28,500 briefs, keyed to 983 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 545,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 28,500 briefs - keyed to 983 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership