Eastside Exhibition Corp. v. 210 East 86th Street Corp.

965 N.E.2d 246 (2012)

From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Eastside Exhibition Corp. v. 210 East 86th Street Corp.

New York Court of Appeals
965 N.E.2d 246 (2012)

  • Written by Rose VanHofwegen, JD
Play video

Facts

Eastside Exhibition Corporation (plaintiff) leased two floors of a seven-story building from 210 East 86th Street Corporation (defendant) to operate a movie theatre under an 18-year lease. Eastside paid $2.75 million to convert the space into a four-screen theatre with a first-floor lobby about 15 feet wide and 40 feet long, with two one-foot square columns 20 feet apart in the center. Four years into the lease, the landlord installed cross bracing between the columns on both floors of the theatre to add two more floors to the building. The cross bracing took up only about 12 square feet of the theatre’s total 15,000 to 19,000 square footage but was not aesthetically appealing, blocked some foot traffic in the lobby, and slightly diminished the second floor waiting area. Eastside stopped paying rent and sued for an injunction, arguing that New York law allowed abatement of rent for any partial eviction, no matter how minimal. The trial court dismissed Eastside’s claim and awarded the landlord unpaid rent, reasoning that the minimal intrusion did not warrant full abatement of the rent. The appellate court reversed, finding no de minimis exception to the New York rule that any unauthorized taking of leased premises amounts to an actual eviction and remanded to the trial court to determine damages. Two experts testified for Eastside but were unwilling or unable to quantify actual damages resulting from the intrusion. The trial court awarded Eastside no damages as a result, and the appellate court affirmed, unwilling to revisit the law of the case as expressed in its earlier opinion. By the time Eastside appealed to New York’s highest state court, it had not paid rent in nine years.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Ciparick, J.)

Dissent (Read, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 802,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 802,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 802,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership