Logourl black
From our private database of 14,000+ case briefs...

Edgewood Independent School District v. Kirby

Supreme Court of Texas
777 S.W.2d 391 (1989)


Facts

The Texas Constitution expressly requires the state legislature to create a system for financing public schools. Under the current system, each district derives funds from state tax revenue, local tax revenue, and federal and other sources. Specifically, the state supplies money derived from sales, severance, and excise taxes, while local districts rely on property tax revenue. However, the amount of property taxes available for school funding depends on the relative wealth of the district. For example, during the 1985–86 school year, the 100 wealthiest districts spent an average of $7,233 per student, while the 100 poorest districts spent an average of $2,978. The average property tax rate in the wealthy districts was 47 cents for every $100 in property value, but the average tax rate in the poorer districts was 74.5 cents. The disparities created by the financing scheme were challenged in state court as violating the Texas Constitution, which requires the legislature to create an efficient system for financing public education that provides for a “general diffusion of knowledge.” The court of appeals held that the system satisfied the constitutional requirements. That decision was appealed to the Supreme Court of Texas.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Issue

The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Holding and Reasoning (Mauzy, J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A “yes” or “no” answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 175,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,000 briefs, keyed to 188 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.