Edgington v. United States
United States Supreme Court
164 U.S. 361 (1896)
- Written by Rich Walter, JD
Facts
The United States (plaintiff) charged Avington A. Edgington (defendant) with giving a false deposition, a so-called crimen falsi or crime involving falsehood, forgery, fraud, or similar dishonest behavior. At trial, Edgington proffered competent and material evidence of his good character. The judge overruled the proffer twice. The first time, the judge said it might be proper to introduce character evidence once Edgington himself had testified. The judge did not explain the second rejection. The jury convicted Edgington, and his appeal reached the United States Supreme Court. Edgington argued the exclusion of his character evidence was reversible error.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Shiras, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 791,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,200 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.