Edison Pharmaceutical Co. v. Food and Drug Administration
United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit
600 F.2d 831 (1979)

- Written by Mary Phelan D'Isa, JD
Facts
The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) rejected a New Drug Application (NDA) from Edison Pharmaceutical Co., the developer of Cothyrobal, an injectable drug intended to treat hypercholesterolemia and hypothyroidism. The drug, a combination of the thyroid extract, sodium levothyroxine, and cyanocobalamin (vitamin B12), was designed specifically to have vitamin B12 inhibit the toxicity of the levothyroxine while maintaining its medicinal benefits. The FDA denied the application because Edison failed to submit double-blind controlled studies comparing the effects of Cothyrobal and levothyroxine, which the FDA determined were necessary to prove the efficacy of Cothyrobal. Edison appealed the ruling and argued that the studies it did submit were as scientifically sound as possible. A panel reversed and ordered the FDA to hold a full evidentiary hearing to determine whether double-blind studies comparing the effects of levothyroxine and Cothyrobal could be conducted safely and to decide all relevant issues relating to the approvability of Edison’s NDA. The FDA held the required hearing and an administrative-law judge (ALJ) excluded the testimonial evidence proffered by Edison to prove the drug’s efficacy and determined that limited double-blind testing could be performed safely and that the studies submitted by Edison failed to demonstrate the safety and efficacy of Cothyrobal, as required by § 505(d)(5) of the Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act of 1938. Edison did not dispute the inadequacies of its testing but appealed the exclusion of its testimonial evidence to establish the efficacy of its drug.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Tamm, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 814,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.