Edwards v. Consolidated Rail Corporation

567 F. Supp. 1087 (1983)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Edwards v. Consolidated Rail Corporation

United States District Court for the District of Columbia
567 F. Supp. 1087 (1983)

Facts

Eleven-year-old Eldee Edwards, Jr. (plaintiff) and three friends rode their bicycles to an isolated railroad of Consolidated Rail Corporation (Conrail) (defendant). Edwards did not see Conrail’s No Unauthorized Vehicles sign. A witness, Charles Riddick, said the train was parked for 20 minutes, and that he had seen children in the area before. The tracks there were through tracks, where trains consistently passed throughout the day rather than being stored for a significant duration. Edwards climbed onto the top of one of the railroad cars and was severely burned by the catenary wires. All three boys did not consider trains dangerous and were not aware of the electrical danger. The catenary wires powered the trains, could not be insulated, and were some 18 feet above the ground and ordinarily inaccessible. Although there were no statutory fencing requirements or other safety regulations, Conrail voluntarily erected fences, posted high-voltage-warning signs, and turned off the current in the catenary wires where trains were stored or the wires came into normal reach. Edwards sued Conrail for negligence. Conrail moved for summary judgment.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Oberdorfer, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership