Edwards v. Consolidated Rail Corporation
United States District Court for the District of Columbia
567 F. Supp. 1087 (1983)
- Written by Ross Sewell, JD
Facts
Eleven-year-old Eldee Edwards, Jr. (plaintiff) and three friends rode their bicycles to an isolated railroad of Consolidated Rail Corporation (Conrail) (defendant). Edwards did not see Conrail’s No Unauthorized Vehicles sign. A witness, Charles Riddick, said the train was parked for 20 minutes, and that he had seen children in the area before. The tracks there were through tracks, where trains consistently passed throughout the day rather than being stored for a significant duration. Edwards climbed onto the top of one of the railroad cars and was severely burned by the catenary wires. All three boys did not consider trains dangerous and were not aware of the electrical danger. The catenary wires powered the trains, could not be insulated, and were some 18 feet above the ground and ordinarily inaccessible. Although there were no statutory fencing requirements or other safety regulations, Conrail voluntarily erected fences, posted high-voltage-warning signs, and turned off the current in the catenary wires where trains were stored or the wires came into normal reach. Edwards sued Conrail for negligence. Conrail moved for summary judgment.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Oberdorfer, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.