From our private database of 28,700+ case briefs...
Edwards v. National Audubon Society, Inc.
United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
556 F.2d 113 (1977)
During intense public controversy over the use of the insecticide DDT, Robert Arbib, Jr., a writer for the National Audubon Society, Inc. (Audubon) (defendant) published a foreword in an Audubon publication. Arbib’s foreword asserted that scientists who cited the Audubon’s bird-count data to support the use of DDT were liars paid off by the pesticide industry. New York Times (Times) nature reporter John Devlin heard about the accusations and believed they were newsworthy, so he reached out to Arbib to find out whom Audubon considered a paid liar. Arbib had not intended to call any specific scientist a paid liar but agreed to compile a list of scientists he believed met the description. Arbib did not know any scientist he could legitimately label a paid liar, so he approached a biologist at the Audubon who was deeply involved in the DDT controversy. The biologist provided a list of five scientists to Arbib and emphasized that he was not calling any of them paid liars; they were simply the scientists who most egregiously misused the bird-count data. Arbib provided the names to Devlin. At trial, Arbib testified that he told Devlin the listed scientists were not considered paid liars. Devlin testified that Arbib represented to him that the five names on the list were the paid liars referred to in the foreword. The list included Dr. J. Gordon Edwards (plaintiff). Devlin reached out to the five scientists and spoke to three. They denied the charges and called the claims unfounded and emotional. After working in good faith to investigate and report both sides of the story accurately, Devlin wrote and published an article about the controversy. The scientists sued Audubon and the Times in federal court. The jury returned a verdict in favor of the scientists. The Times appealed.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Kaufman, C.J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 546,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee
Here's why 546,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 28,700 briefs, keyed to 984 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.