Logourl black
From our private database of 14,000+ case briefs...

Eilers v. Coy

District Court of Minnesota
582 F. Supp. 1093 (1984)


Facts

William Eilers (plaintiff) and his wife were abducted from outside a clinic by family members and deprogrammers (Coy) (defendants) who had been hired by the family members. At the time, Eilers and his wife were members of an authoritarian religious fellowship, and the family members believed that Eilers was suicidal because of a letter he had written months earlier suggesting that demons were attacking his mind and telling him to kill himself. However, after Eilers had written the letter, a psychiatric social worker had determined that Eilers was not a threat to himself or others and reported those findings to the family members. After the abduction, Eilers was taken to the top floor of a dormitory-style building, where he was confined to a room with boarded windows and handcuffed to a bed. For the next two days, Eilers remained handcuffed to the bed and was only allowed out of the room to use the bathroom. Eilers attempted to escape but was forcibly returned to his room. After five-and-a-half days, Eilers was taken out of the building to be transferred to another city for additional deprogramming. During the transfer, Eilers jumped from a vehicle and was assisted by third parties. The police were then contacted and became involved. Eilers eventually brought a claim of false imprisonment against Coy. As a defense against the claim, Coy invoked the doctrine of necessity, arguing that Eiler’s confinement was necessary because he was a danger to himself or others.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Issue

The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Holding and Reasoning (MacLaughlin, J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A “yes” or “no” answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 175,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,000 briefs, keyed to 188 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.