El Dorado Hotel Properties, Ltd. v. Mortensen
Arizona Court of Appeals
136 Ariz. 292, 665 P.2d 1014 (1983)
- Written by Josh Lee, JD
Facts
Bruce Mortensen (defendant) purchased the El Dorado Country Club property from El Dorado Hotel Properties, Ltd. and the United Bank of Arizona (plaintiffs). The purchase agreement required installment payments and provided for a release of the deed to a portion of the property after each installment. The contract stated that Mortensen would be entitled to the release of a portion of the property upon payment of the first installment, which was due on March 1. Mortensen obtained an agreement that the first payment could be delivered on March 5, without defaulting. On March 3, Mortensen provided notice that he would be delivering the required documents to release the first parcel. The plaintiffs stated that they would not be reviewing the documents prior to receiving payment because there was not enough time. On March 4, Mortensen provided additional documentation regarding the parcel. On March 5, Mortensen delivered the installment payment to the title company and authorized the title company to release payment after the deed of release was recorded. The plaintiffs considered this a breach of the agreement because payment was conditioned on obtaining the release. The plaintiffs filed a foreclosure action the same day. The trial court granted summary judgment to the plaintiffs, ruling that the release of the deed to the parcel could not be completed simultaneously with the payment. Mortensen appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Birdsall, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 805,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.