El-Masri v. Macedonia

57 Eur. H.R. Rep. 25 (2012)

From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

El-Masri v. Macedonia

European Court of Human Rights
57 Eur. H.R. Rep. 25 (2012)

  • Written by Tammy Boggs, JD

Facts

Khaled El-Masri (plaintiff) was a German national and suspected terrorist. The United States had understandings with different countries in which suspected terrorists would be delivered to U.S. agents. On December 31, 2003, as El-Masri was headed to Skopje in the Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia (Macedonia) (defendant) for vacation, he was stopped at the Serbia-Macedonia border due to the newness of his German passport. El-Masri was detained and interrogated at the border checkpoint and then taken to a hotel where he was watched by a team of nine men. El-Masri was placed under constant surveillance, threatened at gunpoint, and offered a deal in which he would be released if he confessed to being a member of al-Qaeda. On day 13 of his detention, El-Masri began a hunger strike. On January 23, 2004, Macedonian security forces handcuffed and blindfolded El-Masri and took him to the Skopje Airport, under the guise of returning him to Germany. In fact, El-Masri was being turned over to a team of Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) officers. At the airport, El-Masri was beaten, violently unclothed, sodomized by an object, and tranquilized by a group of disguised men. The aircraft was guarded by Macedonian security guards. Thereafter, El-Masri was transported to a CIA-run facility in Afghanistan, where he was detained in a dark concrete cell for several months and interrogated by CIA officers. El-Masri went on two hunger strikes to protest his detention, and his health deteriorated. El-Masri’s captors forcibly fed him using a feeding tube. Eventually, in late May 2004, El-Masri was returned to Germany, 40 pounds lighter than he had been and in a completely unkempt state. El-Masri initiated a case against Macedonia, alleging violations of the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (the convention), to which Macedonia was bound.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning ()

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 811,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 811,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 811,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership