Logourl black
From our private database of 14,100+ case briefs...

El-Masri v. United States

United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
479 F.3d 296 (4th Cir. 2007)


Facts

Khaled El-Masri (plaintiff) was clandestinely abducted by operatives of the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) in Macedonia and taken to a United States detention facility in Afghanistan, where he was held and questioned for approximately five months under the belief that he was linked to terrorism. El-Masri was released after government authorities determined that his capture was a case of mistaken identity. El-Masri filed suit in federal district court against the CIA director and others (defendants) for damages arising from his detention. In his complaint, El-Masri asserted a Bivens claim pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971), arguing that his Fifth Amendment right to due process had been violated, and also raised claims under the Alien Tort Statute. The defendants claimed that the facts and circumstances surrounding El-Masri’s capture and detention were protected by the state-secrets doctrine pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 517. In support of the claim, the CIA director submitted two sworn declarations: (1) a unclassified document stating why the privilege was invoked and (2) a classified document providing the specific information sought to be protected from disclosure. After reviewing the two declarations, the district court granted the defendants’ motion to dismiss. El-Masri appealed.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Issue

The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Holding and Reasoning (King, J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A "yes" or "no" answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 220,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,100 briefs, keyed to 189 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.