El Souri v. Department of Social Services
Michigan Supreme Court
414 N.W.2d 679, 429 Mich. 203 (1987)
- Written by Samantha Arena, JD
Facts
Under Department of Social Services (DSS) (defendant) policy, during the three years following an alien’s entry into the United States, the income and assets of the alien’s sponsor must be considered when determining the alien’s eligibility for Aid to Families with Dependent Children General Assistance (ADC/GA) benefits. A sponsor was an individual who signed an affidavit accepted by the Immigration and Naturalization Service (INS) agreeing to provide support for an alien as a condition for the alien’s permanent residence in the US. The sponsor’s assets were evaluated to determine whether some portion was considered available to the sponsored alien. Proof of actual contribution was not required. El Souri (plaintiff) was sponsored by Nassib Badawy, El Souri’s father-in-law, who completed the required INS affidavit of support. DSS determined that, due to the level of Badawy’s income, a portion must be deemed available to El Souri. Based on this determination, DSS denied El Souri’s application for general-assistance benefits, despite El Souri being unemployed and receiving no support from Badawy. El Souri appealed. A hearing referee concluded that the denial was appropriate. El Souri sued, arguing that DSS’s policy created a classification based on alienage in violation of the Fourteenth Amendment Equal Protection Clause.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Griffin, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 815,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.