Quimbee logo
DMCA.com Protection Status

EL v. Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority

479 F.3d 232 (3d Cir. 2007)

Case BriefRelatedOptions
From our private database of 34,000+ case briefs...

EL v. Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority

United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

479 F.3d 232 (3d Cir. 2007)

Play video

Facts

In January 2000, Douglas El (plaintiff) was hired on a conditional basis by King Paratransit Services, Inc. (King) to drive paratransit buses providing transportation services for individuals with disabilities. King was a subcontractor with the Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority (SEPTA) (defendant). Under the subcontract, SEPTA prohibited King from hiring anyone with a violent criminal conviction. El was subjected to a criminal background check as a condition of employment. After El was hired, King discovered El had a 40-year-old conviction for second-degree murder. Based on this conviction, El was terminated. El’s conviction was in 1960, at the age of 15, stemming from a gang-related shooting. El, who claimed he did not actually pull the trigger, served three and a half years for the crime. El had no subsequent violent offense convictions. El sued SEPTA under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (Title VII), 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq., alleging SEPTA’s policy regarding criminal convictions had a disparate impact upon African Americans and Hispanics, because members of those groups were more likely than white people to have a criminal record and be automatically ineligible for employment. At trial, SEPTA asserted a business necessity defense, based on expert testimony that individuals with certain criminal convictions had high rates of recidivism and posed higher and less predictable risks to paratransit passengers, who were particularly vulnerable to abuse. The district court granted summary judgment in SEPTA’s favor, concluding it showed enough evidence in support of its business necessity defense that a reasonable juror would be compelled to find in its favor. El appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Ambro, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 607,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 607,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 34,000 briefs, keyed to 984 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 607,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 34,000 briefs - keyed to 984 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership