Elcock v. Kmart Corp.
United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
233 F.3d 734 (2000)
Kmart Corporation (defendant) conceded its liability for injuries Carmelita Elcock (plaintiff) suffered when she slipped and fell at a Kmart store. At trial, the jury determined the damages to award Elcock. Dr. Chester Copemann, a psychologist, gave expert vocational rehabilitation testimony on Elcock's behalf. Copemann did not have a degree in vocational rehabilitation because such degrees were not awarded when he was in school. However, Copemann was familiar with pertinent professional literature and he had helped drug addicts and disabled persons return to the workplace. Copemann testified the accident reduced Elcock's earning capacity by 50 to 60 percent. The jury awarded damages based in part on Copemann's testimony. Kmart appealed the award to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit on the grounds Copemann was not qualified to give expert evidence.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Becker, C.J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 174,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,000 briefs, keyed to 188 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.