Electronic Arts, Inc. v. Textron Inc.
United States District Court for the Northern District of California
103 U.S.P.Q.2d 1984 (2012)
- Written by Alexander Hager-DeMyer, JD
Facts
Textron Inc. and its affiliated companies (Textron) (defendant) designed and manufactured helicopters for use in the United States military, including the AH-1Z, V-22, and UH-1Y models, also known as VIPER, VENOM, and OSPREY. Electronic Arts, Inc. (EA) (plaintiff) developed video games, including the Battlefield series, a military combat-simulator game. EA included several of Textron’s helicopters in the Battlefield games by image and by name, in advertising, packaging, and gameplay. The Textron helicopters were given prominent roles in the games, both as transport and combat vehicles and as selling features for consumers in advertising materials. However, the game packaging stated that any depictions of vehicles in the games did not indicate affiliation or sponsorship. EA filed a complaint for declaratory relief for noninfringement of Textron’s trademarks, and Textron filed multiple counterclaims, arguing various types of trademark and trade-dress infringement. EA moved to dismiss Textron’s counterclaims on First Amendment and nominative-fair-use grounds.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Alsup, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 811,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.