Elefanten Schuh GmbH v. Jacqmain

[1981] E.C.R. 1671, [1982] 3 C.M.L.R. 1, Case C-150/80 (1981)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Elefanten Schuh GmbH v. Jacqmain

European Union Court of Justice
[1981] E.C.R. 1671, [1982] 3 C.M.L.R. 1, Case C-150/80 (1981)

Facts

In 1970, Elefanten Schuh GmbH (Elefanten) (defendant), a German company, hired Pierre Jacqmain (plaintiff), a Belgian resident, to work for its Belgian subsidiary, Elefanten NV (defendant), in Belgium, under a contract written in German. In 1975, a problem arose concerning the transfer of Jacqmain’s contract to Elefanten NV, leading to the termination of Jacqmain’s employment. Jacqmain sued Elefanten and Elefanten NV in Belgium. Both companies filed responses, but Elefanten challenged the court’s jurisdiction nine months later. Elefanten asserted that the employment contract contained a forum-selection clause that designated the courts in Kleve, Germany, as having exclusive jurisdiction over disputes. The Belgian court held that under the Protocol of June 3, 1971, on the Interpretation of the Convention of September 27, 1968, on Jurisdiction and the Enforcement of Judgments in Civil and Commercial Matters (the convention), the forum-selection clause was permissible. However, Belgian law required employment contracts to be written in Dutch. Therefore, the Belgian court considered the forum-selection clause void and unenforceable. Jacqmain obtained a judgment against the two companies jointly. The companies appealed. Because Elefanten’s appeal addressed jurisdiction and the forum-selection clause, the Belgium Supreme Court referred questions to the European Union Court of Justice, focusing on whether the forum-selection clause was enforceable.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Per curiam)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership