Logourl black
From our private database of 12,700+ case briefs...

Elisa B. v. Superior Court

Supreme Court of California
117 P.3d 660 (2005)


Facts

Elisa B. (defendant) and Emily B. were a lesbian couple who agreed to start a family together. Using the same anonymous sperm donor, each became pregnant. Elisa gave birth to a child in November 1997. Emily gave birth to twins in March 1998. One of the twins was born with Down’s syndrome and had serious health problems. Neither woman adopted the children of the other, nor did Emily and Elisa register themselves under California’s domestic partner law. They lived and held themselves out as a family of five, however. Both women breastfed all three children and gave them the same surname: a hyphenation of Elisa’s and Emily’s. Elisa named the three children as dependents on her tax returns. Because Elisa made more money than Emily, they agreed that Elisa would support the family financially while Emily stayed at home for a few years. In November 1999, Emily and Elisa split. Elisa initially provided financial support to Emily and the twins but eventually stopped. Emily and the twins were forced to seek public assistance. The District Attorney of El Dorado County brought a lawsuit in the Superior Court (plaintiff) against Elisa for the payment of child support. The Superior Court ruled that Elisa was liable under the principle of equitable estoppel. The Court of Appeals reversed on the grounds that Elisa was not responsible under California’s version of the Uniform Parentage Act (UPA). The California Supreme Court agreed to review the decision.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision. To access this section, start your 7-day free trial of Quimbee for Law Students.

Issue

The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question. To access this section, start your 7-day free trial of Quimbee for Law Students.

Holding and Reasoning (Moreno, J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A “yes” or “no” answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, start your 7-day free trial of Quimbee for Law Students.

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 121,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 12,700 briefs, keyed to 172 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.