Elliott v. Google, Inc.

860 F.3d 1151 (2017)

From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Elliott v. Google, Inc.

United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
860 F.3d 1151 (2017)

SH
Elliott v. Google, Inc.

Facts

Chris Gillespie registered over 700 domain names that included the word “google.” Google, Inc. (defendant) objected to these registrations and filed a complaint with the National Arbitration Forum on the ground that there was a likelihood of confusion with the Google trademark and, further, that the domain names had been registered in bad faith. The National Arbitration Forum agreed and transferred the domain names in question to Google. Thereafter, Elliott and Gillespie (collectively, Elliott) (plaintiffs) filed suit for the cancellation of the Google trademark, arguing that the word “google” was primarily understood as a generic term used to describe the act of internet searching. The parties filed cross-motions for summary judgment. Google maintained that verb use did not automatically constitute generic use and that Elliott had failed to create a triable issue of fact as to whether the Google trademark was generic. The district court agreed and granted summary judgment in its favor. Elliott appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Tallman, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 814,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 814,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 814,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership