Ellsworth v. Martindale-Hubbell Law Directory, Inc.
North Dakota Supreme Court
280 N.W. 879 (1938)
- Written by Megan Petersen, JD
Facts
Martindale-Hubbell Law Directory, Inc. (Martindale-Hubbell) (defendant) operated a widely-read directory of lawyers. It provided ratings of lawyers, depicted with symbols, for use by other lawyers in forwarding legal business. From 1907 to 1926, Ellsworth (plaintiff), an attorney, received very high ratings on Martindale-Hubbell. However, in 1928, his ratings dropped to predominantly “fair.” In 1929, his ratings were blank, suggesting his performance was so poor as to prohibit him from receiving mention in the directory. Ellsworth brought suit against Martindale-Hubbell for defamation, alleging he suffered a diminution in business due to the low ratings, which he labeled defamatory. The trial court ruled his claim was not actionable per se and ordered Ellsworth to prove special damages. In his amended complaint, Ellsworth presented evidence that his income was substantially lower after 1928, and attributed this to poor Martindale-Hubbell rating. The trial court overruled Martindale-Hubbell’s demurrer to the complaint.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Nuessle, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 815,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.