Empire Lodge Homeowners’ Association v. Moyer
Colorado Supreme Court
39 P.3d 1139 (2001)
- Written by Rose VanHofwegen, JD
Facts
Anne and Russell Moyer (defendants) owned a ranch on a creek tributary to the Arkansas River in Colorado with decreed water rights for irrigation. Empire Lodge Homeowners’ Association (ELHOA) (plaintiff) diverted water above the Moyers’ ranch to fill two ponds for fishing and recreation. While ELHOA filled the ponds, no water returned to the creek. ELHOA owned a right for irrigation and domestic use, but it was rarely “in priority” because it was junior to other rights in the overappropriated Arkansas Basin. Instead ELHOA relied on the state water engineer’s approval to fill its ponds out of priority. The engineer told ELHOA it needed an augmentation-plan decree from water court but continued periodically approving the pond-filling conditioned on ELHOA filing an application. The Moyers placed frequent calls on the creek to stop the pond-filling. After not filing an augmentation-plan application for 12 years, ELHOA sued in water court, invoking the futile-call doctrine and alleging the Moyers had enlarged their use and wasted water. The Moyers counterclaimed to stop the pond-filling, which the engineer testified lost water from evaporation and decreased the Arkansas River system. The water court dismissed ELHOA’s complaint and enjoined the pond-filling. ELHOA appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Hobbs, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.