From our private database of 35,400+ case briefs...
Encarnacion ex rel. George v. Astrue
United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
568 F.3d 72 (2009)
Encarnacion (plaintiff) represented a class of children in a first case in federal district court challenging policies promulgated by the Commissioner of Social Security, Michael Astrue (defendant). Encarnacion claimed the policies violated the Social Security Act’s (SSA) requirement that the administration consider the combined effect of all of an individual’s impairments. Encarnacion also claimed that the policies violated a nearly identical regulation. Particularly, Encarnacion challenged the commissioner’s policy prohibiting the administration from combining less-than-marked functional limitations across domains to amount to a marked limitation and the policy preventing the administration from adjusting the level of limitation in one domain to reflect the impact of the limitation in another domain. The district court granted summary judgment in favor of the commissioner. The Second Circuit affirmed the judgment after finding the commissioner’s regulations sufficiently flexible to adhere to the SSA. The circuit left open the possibility for a suit alleging that the regulations did not allow the administration to adjust the level of a claimant’s limitations across domains. Encarnacion filed such a suit for a second case in district court. The district court granted summary judgment in favor of the commissioner in the second case after finding that the commissioner was not required to engage in cross-domain combination of less-than-marked limitations. Encarnacion appealed.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (McLaughlin, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 617,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee
Here's why 617,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 35,400 briefs, keyed to 984 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.