Quimbee logo
DMCA.com Protection Status

Endrew F. v. Douglas County School District

137 S. Ct. 988 (2017)

Case BriefRelatedOptions
From our private database of 28,500+ case briefs...

Endrew F. v. Douglas County School District

United States Supreme Court

137 S. Ct. 988 (2017)

Play video

Facts

At two years old, Colorado student Endrew F. was diagnosed with autism. Endrew later demonstrated behaviors that impeded his ability to learn in a regular classroom. Through the fourth grade, Endrew attended school in the Douglas County School District (defendant). Although the district provided him an individualized education program (IEP), his parents (plaintiffs) thought it basically carried over the same objectives from year to year. Seeing little meaningful progress, Endrew’s parents moved him to a private school specializing in teaching autistic children, which developed specialized strategies to address his most problematic behaviors. Over the next six months, Endrew improved significantly and made academic progress unseen in public school. Endrew’s parents then met with the public school district once again, which presented a new IEP for fifth grade. However, Endrew’s parents thought it was basically the same as the IEP used the year before, despite Endrew’s progress in private school showing he benefitted from a different approach. Endrew’s parents filed a complaint with the Colorado Department of Education claiming that the school district had failed to meet the requirements of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA), then sought review in federal court. The district court found the annual modification to Endrew’s IEP enough to satisfy the IDEA, and the Tenth Circuit affirmed, reasoning that it allowed at least minimal progress. Endrew’s parents appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Roberts, C.J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 545,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 545,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 28,500 briefs, keyed to 983 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 545,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 28,500 briefs - keyed to 983 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership