Engdahl v. Commissioner

72 T.C. 659 (1979)

From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Engdahl v. Commissioner

Tax Court of the United States
72 T.C. 659 (1979)

SC

Facts

After Dr. Engdahl retired, he and his wife (plaintiffs) looked for a way to supplement his retirement income. They asked veterinarians, a horse trainer, and other horse breeders about the business of horse breeding and decided to start breeding horses. The Engdahls kept complete financial records of their horse operations. They deposited any income derived from horse breeding into a separate savings account. Their accountant reviewed their horse breeding ledgers and created a financial summary each quarter. After three years, the Engdahls sold their house and bought a ranch so they could house their horses on site as opposed to at a stable. The Engdahls spent 35 to 55 hours per week maintaining the horses and ranch. They did not ride the horses themselves and stated they had no emotional attachment to the horses. If a horse did not live up to the Engdahls’ show or breeding standards, they would get rid of it. The Engdahls’ ranch and horses appreciated in value after the purchases. However, the Engdahls lost money on their horse operations every year. The Engdahls deducted these losses on their tax returns. The IRS disallowed the deductions. The Engdahls filed a petition for review in tax court.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Hall, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 816,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 816,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 816,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership