Engineers Club of San Francisco v. United States
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
791 F.2d 686 (1986)
- Written by Daniel Clark, JD
Facts
The Engineers Club of San Francisco (club) (plaintiff) was recognized as a social club under § 501(c)(7) of the Internal Revenue Code (code), which exempted the club from some income taxes. The club leased space in an office building. The club’s stated purposes included encouraging cooperation among engineers, fostering development of the profession, and providing physical space to carry out those purposes. The main function of the club was providing food and beverages during lunches and dinners. Typically, a club member who was also a member of some other professional organization would organize a meal at the club to host members of the professional organization, who may or may not themselves have been club members. The club also hosted outside organizations’ professional programming. The club did not program any professional activities of its own. The club petitioned the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) (defendant) for reclassification as a business league under § 501(c)(6) of the code, which provided more robust tax exemptions than did § 501(c)(7). The IRS denied the club’s request. The club followed standard procedure to protest the IRS’s denial by nonetheless applying for tax refunds. When the IRS duly denied those refunds, the club sued in district court. The district court ruled in favor of the club, and the IRS appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Tang, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 829,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,400 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.