English v. NCAA
Louisiana Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit
439 So.2d 1218 (1983)
Jon English (plaintiff) enrolled at Michigan State University with the intent of playing quarterback for the university’s football team during the 1979-1980 season. After realizing that his playing prospects at Michigan State were poor, English transferred first to a junior college in Pennsylvania and then to Iowa State, seeking to play football during the 1981-1982 season. After having little success there, English transferred again to a junior college in Louisiana and then sought to enroll and play football at Tulane University in the fall of 1983. English’s father was Coach of the Tulane football team. The National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) (defendant) declared English ineligible to play for Tulane based on a rule requiring student-athletes to let a full year elapse “since the transfer from the first four-year college.” After unsuccessfully attempting to persuade the NCAA otherwise, English brought suit. The trial court held for the NCAA and English appealed.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Schott, J.)
Dissent (Barry, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 171,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 13,800 briefs, keyed to 187 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.