Ensign v. Walls

34 N.W.2d 549 (1948)

From our private database of 46,100+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Ensign v. Walls

Michigan Supreme Court
34 N.W.2d 549 (1948)

Play video

Facts

For years, Walls (defendant) operated a business to raise, breed, and board St. Bernard dogs near the property of Ensign (plaintiff). After Walls had operated the business for several years, Ensign and several other families moved into the same neighborhood. Ensign brought suit against Walls on the ground that her business constituted a nuisance. Ensign alleged that noxious odors were constantly emitted from the property, that it was infested with rodents and flies, that dogs frequently escaped and roamed the neighborhood, and that the constant barking of dogs interfered with Ensign’s use and enjoyment of his property. Walls denied Ensign’s allegations and stated that she had operated her business on that property since 1926 and had invested significant money in the buildings and equipment there. She argued that Ensign was not entitled to damages. The trial court found Walls’ business constituted a nuisance, and that Walls had not acquired by prescriptive use the right to continue the nuisance. Walls appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Carr, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 744,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 744,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,100 briefs, keyed to 987 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 744,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,100 briefs - keyed to 987 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership