Enslin v. The Coca-Cola Company
United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania
136 F.Supp.3d 654 (2015)
- Written by Angela Patrick, JD
Facts
Shane Enslin (plaintiff) worked for a company that was eventually acquired by The Coca-Cola Company (Coca-Cola) (defendant). As a condition of Enslin’s employment, he was required to provide certain personal information, including his social security number, bank account information, and driver’s license number. In exchange for this information, Enslin’s employer promised to keep the information secure. However, Enslin’s personal information (as well as the personal information of many other employees) was saved in an unencrypted format on multiple laptops that were later stolen from Coca-Cola. Following the thefts, Enslin suffered from unauthorized uses of his identity and bank information that caused him damages. Enslin sued Coca-Cola for breaching the agreement to keep his personal information secure. In this lawsuit, Enslin claimed that Coca-Cola had been unjustly enriched by choosing to save money instead of protecting its employees’ personal information. Enslin sought the disgorgement of Coca-Cola’s unjust enrichment as restitution damages. Coca-Cola moved to dismiss Enslin’s restitution claim as an invalid type of damages in a breach-of-contract action.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Lesson, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 805,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.