From our private database of 26,900+ case briefs...
Envirocare of Utah, Inc. v. Nuclear Regulatory Commission
United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit
194 F.3d 72 (1999)
Envirocare of Utah, Inc. (Envirocare) (plaintiff) was the first facility licensed to dispose of radioactive waste from offsite sources. When Quivira Mining Company and International Uranium (USA) Corporation applied for licenses, Envirocare tried to intervene in both licensing proceedings and requested a hearing. Envirocare claimed that neither applicant had to meet licensing standards as strict as those Envirocare met, and applying laxer regulations put Envirocare at a competitive disadvantage, harming it economically. The Licensing Board rejected Envirocare’s requests, and the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (defendant) affirmed in both cases. In Quivira’s case, the commission found that Envirocare lacked prudential standing to intervene because its purely economic interest in policing a competitor’s licensing requirements did not fall within the zone of interests that trigger hearing and intervention rights under the Atomic Energy Act (AEA). A few months later, the commission reached the same conclusion in International Uranium’s case. The commission clarified that judicial standing doctrines do not apply in the administrative context because regulatory commissions are not Article III courts, but concluded that Congress intended the AEA hearing and intervention provisions to protect interests other than keeping a competitor from gaining pecuniary advantages. Envirocare petitioned for review.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Randolph, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 540,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee
Here's why 540,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 26,900 briefs, keyed to 983 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.