Environmental Defense Fund v. Thomas

627 F. Supp. 566 (1986)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Environmental Defense Fund v. Thomas

United States District Court for the District of Columbia
627 F. Supp. 566 (1986)

  • Written by Robert Cane, JD

Facts

Congress enacted amendments to the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act, which regulated the management of hazardous and solid wastes. One of the amendments set a deadline of March 1, 1985, for the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to promulgate permitting standards for certain underground tanks. Congress explicitly voiced its concern about the EPA meeting timetables for regulations set by Congress in one of the House Committee reports for the amendments, specifically mentioning delay caused by Executive Order 12291. The EPA formulated its regulations as required by statute and sent its proposed permitting regulations to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for review, as required under Executive Order 12291, before promulgating the regulations. OMB commenced its review on March 4, 1985. OMB sought significant substantive changes in the proposed regulations due to a desire to effect a fundamental shift from the EPA’s goal of containing all leaks of waste to a risk-based analysis of which leaks to regulate. OMB approved the regulations after several months of negotiations on June 12, 1985. Prior to OMB’s approval of the regulations, the Environmental Defense Fund (plaintiff) filed suit in the United States District Court for the District of Columbia on May 30, 1985, to cause Thomas, the EPA Administrator, to promulgate the permitting regulations.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Flannery, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership