Environmental Defense v. Duke Energy Corp.

549 U.S. 561 (2007)

From our private database of 46,200+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Environmental Defense v. Duke Energy Corp.

United States Supreme Court
549 U.S. 561 (2007)

Play video

Facts

In the 1970s, Congress amended the Clean Air Act (CAA) to include two air pollution control mechanisms: New Source Performance Standards (NSPS) and Prevention of Significant Deterioration (PSD) provisions. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) regulations implementing NSPS provided that any physical or operational change to an existing facility that resulted in an increased emissions rate was deemed to be a “modification” and required the facility to use the best technology in making the modifications. Another part of the CAA amendments required a PSD permit to be issued by the EPA before a major emitting facility could be constructed or modified as defined in the NSPS provisions. Duke Energy Corporation (Duke) (defendant) updated its coal-fired electric generating units at eight plants to extend the overall life of the plants but also to allow the plants to run longer each day. Environmental Defense and others (plaintiffs) filed suit in federal court against Duke alleging it violated the CAA by not obtaining permits for its “modifications” as required by the CAA. Duke argued that its modifications did not result in increased hourly emissions and, thus, it was not subject to the PSD permitting requirements. The district court agreed and granted summary judgment to Duke. The court of appeals affirmed. Plaintiffs appealed. The U.S. Supreme Court granted certiorari to review.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Souter, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 777,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 777,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,200 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 777,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,200 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership