From our private database of 32,100+ case briefs...
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Manville Sales Corporation
United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
27 F.3d 1089 (1994)
Charles Mitte (plaintiff) was terminated from his sales-representative position by Manville Sales Corporation (Manville) (defendant). Mitte and the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (the commission) (plaintiff) filed actions under the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA) against Manville in federal district court for improper age discrimination. Mitte argued that he performed better in sales during the past two years than Manville’s younger sales representatives. Manville argued that it was forced to terminate a sales representative due to financial issues and that Mitte was the least effective representative, had difficulty interacting with certain customers and with high-volume accounts, and was inflexible with new opportunities. At trial, Mitte and the commission sought to introduce into evidence the commission’s letter of violation. The letter contained the commission’s conclusion from its investigation that Manville had engaged in improper age discrimination. The district court excluded the letter under Federal Rule of Evidence 403 (Rule 403). The jury returned a verdict in favor of Manville. Mitte and the commission appealed on the ground that the district court had abused its discretion by excluding the letter. The commission argued that the Fifth Circuit had previously held that a letter of reasonable cause issued by the commission was admissible because it was highly probative, with its probative value outweighing any prejudicial effect.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Goldberg, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 583,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee
Here's why 583,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 32,100 briefs, keyed to 984 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.