Equality Foundation of Greater Cincinnati, Inc. v. City of Cincinnati

No. 97-1795 (1998)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Equality Foundation of Greater Cincinnati, Inc. v. City of Cincinnati

United States Supreme Court
No. 97-1795 (1998)

  • Written by Mike Begovic, JD

Facts

The city of Cincinnati (the city) (defendant) enacted an amendment to its city charter that prevented any of its commissions or agencies from adopting policies, rules, or regulations that would award special protection as a minority class to homosexual, bisexual, or lesbian individuals on the basis of their sexual orientation. The United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit rejected a challenge to the city’s amendment. A petition for writ of certiorari was granted by the Supreme Court, which vacated the judgment and remanded the case for further consideration in light of Romer v. Evans, in which the Supreme Court struck down a Colorado state amendment prohibiting municipalities from passing legislation to create a protected class for individuals on the basis of sexual orientation. The Sixth Circuit reaffirmed its earlier decision, finding that Romer did not affect its original analysis. Equality Foundation of Greater Cincinnati, Inc. (EFGC) (plaintiff) filed a new petition for a writ of certiorari, but it was denied.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Stevens, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership