Erickson v. The Bartell Drug Company
United States District Court for the Western District of Washington
141 F. Supp. 2d 1266 (2001)
- Written by Eric Cervone, LLM
Facts
The Bartell Drug Company (Bartell) (defendant) offered a generally comprehensive prescription drug plan to its employees. However, Bartell’s plan excluded prescription contraceptives. Jennifer Erickson (plaintiff) was an employee at Bartell and brought suit, asserting that Bartell’s decision not to cover contraceptives violated Title VII of the Civil Rights Act. Bartell offered a number of arguments as to why its failure to cover contraceptives did not violate Title VII. Among other contentions, Bartell claimed that because contraceptives were voluntary, preventative, and do not treat or prevent disease, they are not truly healthcare-related and thus can be treated differently from other prescription drugs. Bartell also argued that it should be permitted to limit the scope of its employee-benefit programs in order to control costs. The United States District Court for the Western District of Washington heard the case.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Lasnik, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 834,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.
