Ernst v. Child and Youth Services of Chester County

108 F.3d 486 (1997)

From our private database of 46,400+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Ernst v. Child and Youth Services of Chester County

United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
108 F.3d 486 (1997)

Facts

Sylvia Ernst (plaintiff) was the sole guardian for her granddaughter, Susanne, from infancy to age nine. Concerns regarding Susanne’s well-being were raised after she would throw tantrums and refuse to leave her grandmother’s side. Thus, local police investigated the matter, revealing that there were warrants for Ernst’s arrest for child neglect and a petition for custody of Susanne in another state. However, the warrants and the petition had since been withdrawn. The police informed Chester County Children & Youth Services (CYS) (defendant) of its investigation findings and the status of the warrants and petition. After another tantrum, CYS took emergency custody of Susanne and placed her on a psychiatric hold for evaluation. Originally, the goal of CYS was reunification. However, over the course of five years, the relationship between Ernst and CYS workers grew contentious, and the goal of CYS became long-term foster placement. A family-court judge eventually granted Ernst full legal custody. Ernst filed suit under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, alleging that by seizing Susanne, the CYS workers violated her substantive and procedural due-process rights. The district court granted summary judgment in favor of the CYS child-welfare workers based on absolute immunity. Ernst appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Stapleton, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,400 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,400 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership