Espinoza v. Bank of America, N.A.
United States District Court for the Southern District of California
823 F. Supp. 2d 1053 (2011)
- Written by Sean Carroll, JD
Facts
Espinoza (plaintiff) owned property subject to multiple deeds of trust. Espinoza defaulted on two of the deeds of trust, including one owned by Bank of America (defendant). Bank of America commenced judicial foreclosure proceedings. In October 2009, Espinoza signed a short sale agreement with a third party. Bank of America approved the short sale, which closed on March 25, 2010. Upon the short sale, Bank of America released its lien on the property but stated in the reconveyance deed it only released the lien on the property and that Espinoza still owed the underlying debt. Bank of America demanded repayment of the loan. Espinoza filed suit in San Diego Superior Court claiming that California’s anti-deficiency statute prohibited Bank of America from collecting the deficiency resulting from the short sale. Effective January 1, 2011, California amended its anti-deficiency statute to make it applicable to short sales. Bank of America removed the case to the United States District Court for the Southern District of California and filed a motion to dismiss.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Gonzalez, C.J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 810,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.