From our private database of 14,000+ case briefs...
ESPN, Inc. v. Office of the Commissioner of Baseball
United States District Court for the Southern District of New York
76 F. Supp. 2d 383 (1999)
ESPN, Inc. (ESPN) (plaintiff) entered into a contract with the Office of Major League Baseball (Baseball) in 1996, under which ESPN would air all regular season major league baseball games on its network in exchange for yearly fees. Under the contract, ESPN had the right to preempt 10 baseball games per season for other events and air the games on ESPN2, its secondary network. Preemption was contingent on Baseball’s written approval, but Baseball was not permitted to unreasonably deny such requests. In 1998, ESPN sought approval to preempt three baseball games so that it could air football games. Baseball did not approve, but ESPN nevertheless preempted the baseball games. The same thing happened in 1999. ESPN sought to preempt three baseball games, Baseball refused, and ESPN preempted the games anyway. Baseball then terminated the contract, alleging that ESPN had materially breached. ESPN sued, and Baseball counterclaimed, each alleging that the other had breached the contract. In answer to Baseball’s counterclaim, ESPN raised an affirmative defense of election of remedies. Baseball then filed a motion in limine, seeking to bar ESPN from raising the affirmative defense. Baseball also asserted that the contract’s no-waiver provision, which provided that either party’s failure to seek redress for breach or demand strict performance of the agreement did not constitute a waiver of rights or subsequent enforcement, effectively overrode the doctrine of election of remedies.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Scheindlin, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 202,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,000 briefs, keyed to 188 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.