ESPN, Inc. v. Office of the Commissioner of Baseball

76 F. Supp. 2d 416 (1999)

Study Aids
Case Briefs Overview
Casebooks
Case Briefs
E
From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

ESPN, Inc. v. Office of the Commissioner of Baseball

United States District Court for the Southern District of New York
76 F. Supp. 2d 416 (1999)

  • Written by Joseph Bowman, JD
Play video

Facts

ESPN, Inc. (ESPN) (defendant) did not air six baseball games as scheduled. ESPN paid the Office of the Commissioner of Baseball (Baseball) (plaintiff) the full amount due under the contract. Baseball sued for damages “believed to exceed millions of dollars” for various losses related to television package value, revenue, and exposure. During discovery, ESPN asked Baseball for concrete evidence of specific losses and damage amounts. Baseball could not give specific examples but argued that it had suffered substantial harm. ESPN and Baseball each filed five motions in limine. Nine of the motions were decided by opinion or hearing. At the hearing, Baseball was again unable to give proof of damages when the court asked. The United States District Court for the Southern District of New York considered ESPN’s motion in limine to block Baseball from presenting evidence of what ESPN claimed were unsupported allegations of monetary damages.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Scheindlin, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 805,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 805,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 805,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership

Casebooks

Contracts

Key Terms